Bombay High Court’s New Building: A “Missed Opportunity” for Justice?

Former Bombay High Court Judge Justice Gautam Patel recently delivered a sharp critique of the proposed new High Court building, labeling it “fundamentally undemocratic” and a “missed opportunity.” His comments spark a vital debate on the true purpose of public architecture, particularly for institutions as crucial as the judiciary.

Justice Patel argued that the current design, with its resemblance to a “luxury hotel,” strays significantly from its core function. He emphasized that judicial infrastructure should prioritize its primary users: litigants and lawyers. Instead of focusing on “monumentality,” the design should embody a “litigant-centric” approach, ensuring practical, accessible, and comfortable spaces for those seeking justice.

He advocated for a “climate resilient” design, stressing the need for sustainable and functional spaces over aesthetic grandiosity. The former judge questioned the rationale behind a structure that appears to prioritize opulent visuals over the everyday practicalities faced by thousands frequenting the courts. This vision calls for buildings that are not just impressive but truly serve the public good, reflecting principles of democracy and accessibility.

Justice Patel’s insightful criticism serves as a crucial reminder that public buildings, especially those integral to justice, must be designed with their users at heart. It’s a call to rethink architectural priorities, ensuring functionality, accessibility, and resilience take precedence over superficial grandeur, thereby creating spaces that truly uphold the spirit of democracy and justice.