Justice Gautam Patel Slams New Building Design: A Call for Democratic, Litigant-Centric Spaces

Former Bombay High Court Judge Justice Gautam Patel has voiced strong criticism against the proposed new building, labeling it “fundamentally undemocratic” and a “missed opportunity.” His comments highlight a crucial debate on the purpose and design of public institutions, particularly those serving the judiciary.

Justice Patel’s central argument revolves around the building’s failure to prioritize its primary users: litigants. He expressed dismay that the design appears to mimic a “luxury hotel” rather than a functional, accessible space for justice. He emphasized the urgent need for a “litigant-centric” approach, where the convenience and needs of those seeking justice are paramount. This vision includes practical considerations for lawyers and the public, moving away from what he perceives as a misguided focus on “monumentality” over genuine utility.

Beyond accessibility, Justice Patel also advocated for a “climate resilient” design, suggesting a forward-thinking approach that integrates environmental sustainability with public service. He questioned the current emphasis on grandiosity, arguing that true public architecture should reflect democratic values through its functionality, ease of access, and ability to serve the community efficiently. His critique underscores a vital lesson: public buildings, especially those integral to the justice system, must be designed with their purpose and people in mind, fostering an environment of inclusivity and practicality rather than mere aesthetic grandeur.

His insightful remarks serve as a powerful reminder for urban planners and architects to reconsider the core values embedded in public infrastructure. The discussion ignited by Justice Patel is not just about a building; it’s about the very ethos of public service and democratic representation in architecture.